Myths, instrumental reality, or cultural change? Modern service-oriented government reforms in China
Xiaolong Tian, Tom Christensen
Nanjing University of Finance and Economics University of Oslo Renmin University of China Tsinghua University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This article provides a greater understanding of the service-oriented government (SOG) reforms that China carried out at the central level in 2008, 2013, and 2018. These reforms involved two common post-NPM structural measures – namely, super-ministries and cross-ministerial networks or leading groups. Using a mythical, an instrumental, and a cultural perspective, this article examines how SOG reforms were carried out and enquires into the relevance of “Chinese characteristics.” Our analysis shows that China’s SOG reforms represent quite a complex and hybrid pattern with a dual orientation of service value and coordination action. The CPC’s leadership of government reform and major work in all areas are fundamental characteristics of China’s socialist administrative system.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Policy and Reform Studies
参考文献 48
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 16
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条