The European External Action Service and agenda-setting in European foreign policy
Sophie Vanhoonacker, Karolina Pomorska
内容与影响
The new High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR) and the European External Action Service (EEAS) have emerged after the Lisbon Treaty as a potential driving force in European foreign policy. This article critically reviews the first two years of the existence of the EEAS to find out whether these new players have managed to shape the direction of the European Union's (EU) external activities. Building on a typology of agenda-setting strategies in the EU developed by Princen (2011) Princen, S. 2011. Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7): 927–43. (doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.599960)[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], it successively examines how the HR and the EEAS have been trying to ‘build credibility’ and ‘to gain attention’ for their priorities. The empirical analysis shows that priority has been given to addressing the ‘credibility challenge’, with a particular emphasis on capacity-building. The strategies of mobilizing partners and arousing interest through framing still leave scope for improvement.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
回答优先基于摘要、文献信息与可获取全文;依据不足时会明确说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学European Union Policy and Governance
International Development and Aid · Policy Transfer and Learning
参考文献 33
此处列出前 3 条
施引文献 103
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条