Environmental education program evaluation in the new millennium: what do we measure and what have we learned?
Marc J. Stern, Robert B. Powell, Dawn Hill
Virginia Tech Clemson University University of Arizona
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
We conducted a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed research studies published between 1999 and 2010 that empirically evaluated the outcomes of environmental education (EE) programs for youth (ages 18 and younger) in an attempt to address the following objectives: (1) to seek reported empirical evidence for what works (or does not) in EE programming and (2) to uncover lessons regarding promising approaches for future EE initiatives and their evaluation. While the review generally supports consensus-based best practices, such as those published in the North American Association for Environmental Education’s Guidelines for Excellence, we also identified additional themes that may drive positive outcomes, including the provision of holistic experiences and the characteristics and delivery styles of environmental educators. Overall, the evidence in support of these themes contained in the 66 articles reviewed is mostly circumstantial. Few studies attempted to empirically isolate the characteristics of programs responsible for measured outcomes. We discuss general trends in research design and the associated implications for future research and EE programming.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Environmental Education and Sustainability
Urban Green Space and Health · Diverse Educational Innovations Studies
参考文献 102
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 411
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条