Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce
Noortje de Boer, Nadine Raaphorst
Utrecht University Leiden University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
A dominant assumption in the street-level bureaucracy literature is that bureaucrats’ discretion is curtailed by automated systems. Drawing on survey and factual data (n = 549) from Dutch inspectors, we test the effect of automation on enforcement style and whether this can be explained by discretion-as-perceived. Our results show that automation (1) increases bureaucrats’ legal and accommodation style; (2) discretion-as-perceived does not mediate this effect; but (3) automation does decrease discretion-as-perceived. The main implication is that we do not find empirical evidence for curtailment and future research should move beyond discretion to understand effects of digital systems on bureaucrats’ behaviour.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Regulation and Compliance Studies
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
参考文献 78
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 131
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条