The Open Classroom Reconsidered
James Rothenberg
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The open classroom fad has come and gone. There was much that deserved criticism in the way many open classrooms were implemented. Yet the nature of open classrooms was frequently misunderstood. The term "open" was often confused with the arrangement of walls and furniture, and many people thought that open classrooms were unstructured environments. However, open classrooms that were carefully organized by adequately prepared, committed teachers had much to offer students. Research indicates that students in open classrooms were more independent and less conforming, acted more cooperatively, and displayed more creativity than students in traditional classrooms. I contend that, in the current era of school reform, educators should reexamine the philosophy underlying open classrooms and, in revised form and far more carefully than in the past, create open classrooms in schools. In this article I describe open classrooms and summarize their history. I discuss how the structure of open classrooms is likely to affect a variety of schooling outcomes and I review research on the academic and nonacademic outcomes for students in open classrooms. In the final sections of the article I examine the problems of open classrooms and reasons for their decline and then discuss ways to avoid at least some of these problems.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
Diverse Education Studies and Reforms · Education and Technology Integration
参考文献 23
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 20
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条