Low frequency magnetic field induction factors for exposure assessment in the human hand
Pia Schneeweiss, René Hirtl, Gernot Schmid
Seibersdorf Laboratories (Austria)
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
According to European Union (EU) Directive 2013/35/EU, occupational low frequency magnetic field exposure of the hands is assessed by comparing the maximum magnetic induction with the corresponding action level for the limbs (AL Limb ). If AL Limb is exceeded, it must be demonstrated that the exposure limit values (ELVs) defined by the 2 × 2 × 2 mm 3 averaged in situ electric field strength ( Ê i, avg ) are not exceeded. However, there is no solid scientific evidence for the currently used AL Limb . Assuming that AL Limb ensures compliance with the ELV in all limb regions, including areas with larger cross-sections like the lap, questions arise about its conservatism for exposure assessment of localized hand exposure. Therefore, we derived reasonable worst-case induction factors (IFs) for the hand using systematic numerical computations on 16 different MRI-based high-resolution anatomical hand models. Two simplified hand models were also included for comparison. The simulations yielded a robust IF of 0.6 (V m −1 ) T −1 Hz −1 for a hand size representing the 95th percentile of adult males. This corresponds to a 33% relaxation of the magnetic induction limit compared to the current AL Limb , which may reduce unnecessary restrictions in many workplaces with localized hand exposure. However, these relaxed limits must not be applied to other limb regions without proper verification. Furthermore, the study shows that oversimplified hand models, as proposed in the European standard EN 62369-1:2009, tend to significantly underestimate exposure and should therefore no longer be used for dosimetric exposure assessment. Finally, the data obtained confirm that in the case of localized exposure of body parts, comparing the 99th percentile of Ê i, avg instead of the (reasonably evaluated) peak spatial Ê i, avg with the ELV leads to a significant underestimation of exposure, because real ‘hot spots’ of Ê i, avg are excluded from the evaluation, although they should be taken into account to avoid localized effects on the nervous system.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Wireless Body Area Networks · Body Composition Measurement Techniques
参考文献 24
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 1
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条