Climate mitigation and adaptation strategies tailored for different types of European cities: a typology and associated systematic review
Mira Kopp, Simon Montfort, Géraldine Pflieger, Natascha Wagner, Olexiy Kyrychenko, Rita Nogherotto, Alona Zharova, Alexander A. Baklanov 等 13 位
Leibniz Association Technische Universität Berlin Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Amidst escalating climate impacts and continued emissions, numerous case studies have examined how cities can mitigate and adapt to climate change. Yet, systematic cross-sectoral and cross-impact assessments that identify which climate actions are relevant to which types of cities remain limited. This study addresses this gap for Europe through a data-driven analysis of European cities, categorising them into four distinct city types ( Shrinking cities, Growing cities, Established cities, Metropolises ), quantitatively analysing their need and capacity to act on climate change, and providing a systematic overview of effective climate action strategies for each of these clusters. Based on harmonised data for all 1263 cities in Europe, we identify sectoral and climate impact hotspots requiring concerted climate action across the four city types. These include reducing building- and transport-related greenhouse gas emissions in Metropolises and Established cities , heat and drought risk in Growing cities , and flood risk in Shrinking cities . Drawing on the existing case study literature comprising 1613 climate action assessments, we provide context-specific recommendations for addressing these climate hotspots and unlocking co-benefits by overcoming reported implementation challenges such as limited finance, local governance capacity, behavioural inertia and distributional conflicts. We further outline research gaps for more actionable knowledge on urban climate mitigation and adaptation with regards to scope of cities covered, kinds of actions assessed, and quality of evaluations performed. Together, these insights can inform cross-city learning and targeted policy and investment prioritisation across urban planning, public services, technology deployment or governance capacity in line with local contexts.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Climate Change and Sustainable Development · Climate Change Policy and Economics
参考文献 0
引用本文 2
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条