Can molecular dynamics simulations improve predictions of protein-ligand binding affinity with machine learning?
Shukai Gu, Chao Shen, Jiahui Yu, Hong Zhao, Huanxiang Liu, Liwei Liu, RONG R. SHENG, Lei Xu 等 11 位
Zhejiang University Macao Polytechnic University Huawei Technologies (China) Jiangsu University of Technology
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Binding affinity prediction largely determines the discovery efficiency of lead compounds in drug discovery. Recently, machine learning (ML)-based approaches have attracted much attention in hopes of enhancing the predictive performance of traditional physics-based approaches. In this study, we evaluated the impact of structural dynamic information on the binding affinity prediction by comparing the models trained on different dimensional descriptors, using three targets (i.e. JAK1, TAF1-BD2 and DDR1) and their corresponding ligands as the examples. Here, 2D descriptors are traditional ECFP4 fingerprints, 3D descriptors are the energy terms of the Smina and NNscore scoring functions and 4D descriptors contain the structural dynamic information derived from the trajectories based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We systematically investigate the MD-refined binding affinity prediction performance of three classical ML algorithms (i.e. RF, SVR and XGB) as well as two common virtual screening methods, namely Glide docking and MM/PBSA. The outcomes of the ML models built using various dimensional descriptors and their combinations reveal that the MD refinement with the optimized protocol can improve the predictive performance on the TAF1-BD2 target with considerable structural flexibility, but not for the less flexible JAK1 and DDR1 targets, when taking docking poses as the initial structure instead of the crystal structures. The results highlight the importance of the initial structures to the final performance of the model through conformational analysis on the three targets with different flexibility.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Protein Structure and Dynamics · RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
参考文献 66
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 41
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条