The Impact of Adopting Whole-Genome Sequencing for Tuberculosis Diagnosis in China: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Yibei He, Xuanjing Li, Chang Liu, Stella Wong, Bonan Fan, Dan Xu, J R Colón Pagán, Jiajun Yuan 等 10 位
Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai Mental Health Center Imperial College London Southern Medical University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Background: China is a high-burden tuberculosis (TB) country and delays in diagnosis and effective treatment have further exacerbated this situation. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has emerged as a reliable approach for drug susceptibility testing (DST) in TB. Whole-genome sequencing can not only improve TB treatment outcomes but also requires significant investments in laboratory infrastructure and trained personnel. It is unclear whether WGS is a cost-effective strategy for routine TB diagnosis in China. Methods: We developed a decision tree-Markov model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and health impact of WGS-based DST compared with culture-based DST and rapid molecular testing strategies (Xpert and Xpert Ultra), adopting a societal perspective. Results: Base-case analysis demonstrated that WGS, Xpert, and Xpert Ultra were cost-saving strategies for TB management. Compared with culture-based DST, the incremental net monetary benefits for Xpert, Xpert Ultra, and WGS were $1750.06, $1832.84, and $1939.32, respectively. Over a lifetime horizon, WGS emerged as the optimal DST strategy, reducing direct medical costs by $401.83 per patient, gaining an additional 0.121 quality-adjusted life years per case, and decreasing TB mortality by 45 cases per 10 000 patients. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings across key parameters. Conclusions: Whole-genome sequencing-based DST offers a cost-saving solution for patients with TB in China, achieving better health and economic outcomes compared with alternative strategies. The findings suggest that the widespread adoption of WGS-based DST in China would be cost-effective and aligns well with public health priorities in high-burden settings.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Genomics and Rare Diseases · Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
参考文献 29
此处列出前 3 条