Tracking the development of disciplinary structure in China’s top research universities (1998–2013)
Li Feng, Yajun Miao, Jing Ding
Hohai University Hefei University of Technology
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This study focuses on the development of disciplinary structure in China’s top research universities. Using the science structures of Mainland China, the world, and the world’s top 10 universities as three reference standards, we measure the disciplinary structure ‘distance’ between the Chinese ‘985 universities’ and the references, and analyze whether the 985 universities are moving toward or away from the reference groups (RG) in terms of disciplinary structure. The results show that most of the 985 universities’ disciplinary structures are very similar to China’s science structure. The disciplinary structure distances between the 985 universities and both the world reference and the world’s top universities reference have narrowed recently, but the overall degrees of similarity are still low. Another important finding is that the rise of biomedical science has played an important role in the 985 universities’ move from a native ‘sci-engineering focused’ structure to an international ‘bio-science focused’ structure.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIscientometrics and bibliometrics research
Health and Medical Research Impacts · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
参考文献 30
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 7
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条