SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES AND AGGREGATE-ASSOCIATED C, N, AND P DISTRIBUTIONS IN ORGANIC AND CONVENTIONAL CROPPING SYSTEMS
V. Steven Green, Michel A. Cavigelli, Thanh H. Dao, Dennis C. Flanagan
United States Department of Agriculture Beltsville Agricultural Research Center National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Organic farming, which is growing in popularity, has been proposed as a sustainable alternative to conventional farming practices. However, it is not known how organic farming systems affect soil erosion risk and sediment-bound nutrient transport. Our objectives were to compare soil erosion risk and sediment bound nutrient transport potential for grain-based conventional and organic cropping systems by determining selected soil physical properties and distributions of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) in soil aggregates of the 0-5 cm depth of a Christiana-Matapeake-Keyport soil association. We measured soil bulk density, aggregate stability, aggregate size distributions, and total C, N, and P associated with five soil aggregate size classes in no-till (NT) and chisel till (CT) systems and in an organic system (ORG). No-till soils had lesser bulk density and greater aggregate stability than did CT and ORG soils. Carbon, N, and P concentrations were greater in large (>2.00 mm) and small macroaggregates (0.21 to 2.00 mm) than in microaggregates (<0.21 mm) regardless of cropping system. When nutrient concentrations were combined with aggregate distribution data, the quantity of aggregate associated nutrients was greatest in microaggregates in ORG and CT soils but greatest in macroaggregates in NT soils. These results indicate an increased risk of sediment associated nutrient transport from ORG and CT soils compared with NT soils, since microaggregates in these soils are preferentially lost through sediment transport. The NT cropping system promoted macroaggregate formation and reduced the risk of particulate nutrient transport in this warm, humid region soil.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics · Soil erosion and sediment transport
参考文献 38
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 99
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条