Combined effects of packaging colour and shape on consumers’ sweetness expectations and purchase intentions for hedonic foods
Miyuri Shirai
Keio University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Purpose Product packaging visually distinguishes products, making it a key determinant of a product’s success. This study examines two highly prominent packaging elements – colour and shape – of hedonic foods and their combined effects on consumers’ sensory expectations, such as the perceived sweetness, and their subsequent purchase intentions. Design/methodology/approach Study 1 conducted an experiment to examine the interaction effect between packaging colour (red vs blue) and shape (round vs angular) on consumers’ sweetness expectations and purchase intentions, with product-related perceptions serving as mediators. Study 2 used a survey involving a choice task to examine differences in consumers’ preferences between round-red and angular-red packaging, incorporating shape-related perceptions. A two-way between-subjects ANOVA, moderated mediation and binary logistic regression analyses were employed for data analyses. Findings Colour and shape interactively influenced sweetness expectations, with shape’s effect being more pronounced for blue packaging than red packaging. Moreover, the enhanced sweetness expectations triggered by packaging increased purchase intentions by amplifying expected food enjoyment and perceived package attractiveness. Furthermore, consumers preferred the round-red packaging to the angular-red packaging when focusing on sweetness, colour–shape congruency and package attractiveness; the angular-red packaging was favoured when consumers focused on package typicality. Originality/value This research advances the body of knowledge on consumer responses to product packaging by providing insights into the combined effects of the colour and shape of packaging for hedonic foods. Our findings highlight the importance of strategic packaging design while considering the combined impacts of colour and shape.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Consumer Packaging Perceptions and Trends
Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods · Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
参考文献 53
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 6
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条