A process model for industrial heritage adaptive reuse: integrating environmental remediation and structural assessment
Pari Alavi, Ali Jahanbakhsh Mashhadi, Kamal Rouhparvar, Alireza Joze Piri, Farbod Khalili, Ashkan Khatibi
Islamic Azad University of Zanjan Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Urmia University Islamic Azad University, Tehran
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Purpose This paper addresses significant geographical and phase-based gaps in adaptive reuse models for industrial heritage, which faces challenges such as pollution and structural decay. It proposes a novel conceptual model integrating environmental remediation and structural capacity into a four-phase process for sustainable urban revitalization. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review of 106 peer-reviewed articles (2010–2024) was conducted using the PRISMA approach. Literature was analyzed across adaptive reuse phases to identify trends, gaps and best practices. Findings Analysis reveals a 78% geographical bias toward Europe, North America and East Asia, and a research imbalance with 48% of studies on preparation and only 12% on implementation. Contamination management constitutes 30–40% of remediation costs, and structural complexity requires advanced engineering in 60% of retrofits. These insights inform the proposed four-phase, 11-sub-phase model. Research limitations/implications Reliance on English-language sources and inherent geographical bias limit generalizability, suggesting future empirical testing in diverse contexts such as the Global South. Practical implications The model provides actionable guidance for architects, planners and policymakers to prioritize remediation and structural assessment, fostering economic benefits such as property value increases and aligning with sustainability goals. Originality/value This research develops a dedicated adaptive reuse process model for industrial heritage, extending existing frameworks by integrating industry-specific environmental and structural criteria as core components to bridge theoretical and practical gaps.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Urban Planning and Valuation · Urban Development and Cultural Heritage
参考文献 91
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 1
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条