Distraction is All You Need for Multimodal Large Language Model Jailbreaking
Zuopeng Yang, Jiluan Fan, Anli Yan, Erdun Gao, Xin Lin, Tao Li, Kanghua Mo, Changyu Dong
Guangzhou University Australian Centre for Robotic Vision The University of Adelaide Shanghai Jiao Tong University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) bridge the gap between visual and textual data, enabling a range of advanced applications. However, complex internal interactions among visual elements and their alignment with text can introduce vulnerabilities, which may be exploited to bypass safety mechanisms. To address this, we analyze the relationship between image content and task and find that the complexity of subimages, rather than their content, is key. Building on this insight, we propose the Distraction Hypothesis, followed by a novel framework called Contrasting Subimage Distraction Jailbreaking (CS-DJ), to achieve jailbreaking by disrupting MLLMs alignment through multi-level distraction strategies. CS-DJ consists of two components: structured distraction, achieved through query decomposition that induces a distributional shift by fragmenting harmful prompts into sub-queries, and visual-enhanced distraction, realized by constructing contrasting subimages to disrupt the interactions among visual elements within the model. This dual strategy disperses the model’s attention, reducing its ability to detect and mitigate harmful content. Extensive experiments across five representative scenarios and four popular closed-source MLLMs, including GPT-4o-mini, GPT-4o, GPT-4V, and Gemini-1.5-Flash, demonstrate that CS-DJ achieves average success rates of 52.40% for the attack success rate and 74.10% for the ensemble attack success rate. These results reveal the potential of distraction-based approaches to exploit and bypass MLLMs’ defenses, offering new insights for attack strategies. Our code is available at https://github.com/TeamPigeonLab/CS-DJ.Warning: This paper contains unfiltered content generated by MLLMs that may be offensive to readers
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AITopic Modeling
Natural Language Processing Techniques
参考文献 20
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 11
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条