A Multisensor Approach Integrating Cyclostationary Analysis and Evidence Theory for Explainable Bearing Fault Diagnosis
Feiyang Wang, Yanchao Liu, Yan Wang, Kelin Wu, Dazhuan Wu
Zhejiang Energy Research Institute Zhejiang University Zhejiang Ocean University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Rolling element bearing diagnostics has long been a crucial and challenging problem in industrial applications due to the presence of heavy and intricate noise. Demodulation techniques excel in revealing faulty modulation characteristics in rolling element bearings, offering a strongly explainable result compared with other intelligent algorithms. However, the diagnostic process heavily relies on manual judgment, often leading to potential misdiagnoses and false alarms. Besides, single-sensor diagnostics may fail to achieve high accuracy due to the uncertainty of information. Thus, this paper proposes a multi-sensor fault diagnosis method based on cyclostationary analysis and evidence theory for the explainable diagnosis of rolling element bearings. First, the feature vector containing bearing fault characteristics is constructed by cyclostationary analysis. Second, the Mahalanobis distance between training data and test data is utilized to generate the basic probability assignment (BPA) of Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory. Third, to deal with the conflicting information, weight factors are assigned to the original BPAs based on the Mahalanobis distance as well. Last, the diagnosis result is obtained by fusing the BPAs of multiple sensors via Dempster’s combination rule (DCR). Through the validation by experiments, the superiority of the proposed method is demonstrated in comparison with other state-of-the-art methods based on evidence theory. The proposed method can identify the fault type and fault severity of the bearing with 97.84% average accuracy. Furthermore, it exhibits excellent generalization ability, high accuracy with small sample sizes, and strong noise resistance.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Fault Detection and Control Systems · Risk and Safety Analysis
参考文献 38
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 10
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条