Improving Indoor Localization Using Mobile UWB Sensor and Deep Reinforcement Learning
Leyla Nosrati, Samaneh Hosseini Semnani, Mohammad Sadegh Fazel, Sajed Rakhshani, Mohammad Ghavami
Isfahan University of Technology Isfahan University of Medical Sciences London South Bank University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Indoor localization has posed a significant challenge for researchers. Current methodologies predominantly rely on ultrawideband (UWB) technology and the selection of an appropriate number of anchor points to achieve precise accuracy at the centimeter level. However, the efficacy of these approaches can be compromised when anchor points are incorrectly positioned due to factors such as multipath effects. Such misalignment can lead to signal power attenuation, thereby diminishing the overall accuracy of localization. In this article, we propose a novel solution to address this issue. Our approach involves the utilization of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to train a mobile UWB sensor in the identification of suitable anchor points. By leveraging DRL, we aim to mitigate the loss of transmitted signal power associated with unsuitable anchor placement. Subsequently, we conduct an evaluation to compare the performance of intelligently selected anchor points against two alternative strategies: anchor points selected with predefined constant positions and those chosen randomly. We employ the convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm for this comparative analysis. Specifically, we utilize the received UWB signal time vector as input and predict the 2-D target position using a CNN regressor to estimate the target location. Our simulation results demonstrate a significant improvement in localization accuracy when employing the DRL approach for anchor point selection. Specifically, the mean absolute error (MAE) achieved is approximately 0.09 m which represents a significant improvement compared to manual or random selection of anchor points, which provide MAEs of about 0.45 and 1.20 m, respectively.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
参考文献 15
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 9
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条