Active RIS Versus Passive RIS: Which is Superior With the Same Power Budget?
Kangda Zhi, Cunhua Pan, Hong Ren, Kok Keong Chai, Maged Elkashlan
Queen Mary University of London Southeast University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This letter theoretically compares the active reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-aided system with the passive RIS-aided system. For a fair comparison, we consider that these two systems have the same overall power budget that can be used at both the base station (BS) and the RIS. For active RIS, we first derive the optimal power splitting between the BS’s transmit signal power and RIS’s output signal power. We also analyze the impact of various system parameters on the optimal power splitting ratio. Then, we theoretically and numerically compare the performance between the active RIS and the passive RIS, which demonstrates that the active RIS would be superior if the power budget is not very small and the number of RIS elements is not very large.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Satellite Communication Systems · Optical Wireless Communication Technologies
参考文献 16
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 586
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条