Comparing Supervised Machine-Learning Algorithms to Measure the Number of Technical Actions in Industrial Environments
Juri Taborri, Daniele Melloni, Andrea Zingoni, Francesco Marcolin, Alessandro Bertoz, Marco Bordignon, Stefano Rossi
Università degli Studi della Tuscia
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The counting of technical actions during work cycle is fundamental to identify biomechanical risks. One of the most widespread indices to assess the risk of upper limb musculoskeletal disorders is the Occupational Repetitive Action (OCRA), where the counting requires the video analysis of workstation performed by a skilled operator. This approach is questionable due to the lack of objectivity, leading to low level of repeatability and reproducibility. Thus, the automatization of such approach is still an untapped challenge. In this context, the paper aims at evaluating the feasibility to use machine-learning algorithms fed with inertial data to automatically count the technical actions in industrial environments. From this perspective, we performed a comparative analysis of seven machine-learning algorithms fed with features extracted from joint angles related to shoulder, elbow and wrist. Data was gathered from one worker in six different real industrial scenarios. The worker was sensorized with 17 inertial sensors. An RGB camera was also used during the experimental protocol in order to create the reference labelled actions. The performance of the classifiers was computed considering the confusion matrix and the overall accuracy. In addition. Two approaches were tested, where the first one consisted in a multiclass classification (M), whereas the second one in a binary one (B). Specifically, M consisted in the recognition of each specific technical action before the counting; whereas B in the recognition of technical actions with respect to no-actions phase, regardless the type of the action. Support vector machine with a quadratic kernel achieved the best accuracy, which was greater than 77.7% for all the tested scenarios when considering a binary approach. The findings of this study could represent a step forward in the automatization of technical action counting for the computation of the OCRA index.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders · Human Pose and Action Recognition