Social Graph Generation Under Local Differential Privacy Protection
Wenhao Wang, Shunshun Peng, Zhiyuan Ning, Quanwang Wu, Hongbing Wang, Taolin Guo
Chongqing Normal University Chongqing University Guizhou Normal University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Social networks collect data on users' social relationships to construct social network graphs. Service providers analyze and mine this data to capture business value and enhance revenue. However, untrusted servers pose a risk of user privacy breaches. Local differential privacy (LDP) techniques allow untrusted data aggregators to perform item-based data analysis on distributed private data, such as users' social relationships. Implementing differential privacy protocols in large-scale social networks presents challenges due to the multidimensional structures of user relationships and the need to preserve data utility. The introduction of noise in these methods can lead to significant loss of information entropy. To address this issue, we propose LDP-MSN, an aggregation method designed for relationship preservation in large user social networks operating under LDP. LDP-MSN reduces the dimensionality of large networks through a random projection method while maintaining the similarity between users. This approach allows for user network analysis using the reduced-dimensionality data, preserving similarity and minimizing the effects of noise mechanisms by perturbing the reduced data rather than the original data. Since the downscaled data is sensitive to noise, applying differential privacy techniques can lead to reduced functionality. To counter this, we employ the Rank-1 Singular Multivariate Gaussian (R1SMG) mechanism. This mechanism is more stable and less likely to produce excessive noise that could distort query results, thereby helping to preserve user network relationships. We provide a theoretical proof of the privacy and utility of LDP-MSN and demonstrate its advantages over existing methods using publicly available datasets.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection · Cryptography and Data Security
参考文献 12
此处列出前 3 条