Inheriting Versus Developing Data Analytic Tests and Auditors’ Professional Skepticism
Xiaoxing Li, Joseph F. Brazel, Anna Nöteberg, Justin Leiby
Norwegian School of Economics North Carolina State University Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
As the use of audit data analytic tests (ADA) becomes increasingly established in practice, auditors will often confront situations in which they inherit ADA developed by others, as opposed to developing the ADA themselves. Despite the potential benefits of ADA, inheriting ADA could decrease auditors’ skeptical actions by diminishing their psychological ownership of the ADA. In an experiment where an ADA identifies a fraud red flag, we find that auditors who inherited the ADA are less likely to exercise skeptical actions than those who were personally involved in its development. We then provide evidence that informing auditors who inherit an ADA about the test development activities (e.g., a brief memorandum documenting the ADA's development) mitigates the negative effect of inheriting the ADA. Evidence from mediation analyses suggests that these effects are driven by decreased psychological ownership when auditors inherit the ADA.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Corporate Governance and Financial Management · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection