Being private, Big 4 auditors, and debt raising
Wen Hua Sharpe, Peter John Carey, Hong Feng Zhang
Federation University Deakin University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This study investigates the role of auditor choice (Big 4/Non‐Big 4) in debt financing for private and public firms. We find private firms have less access to debt than public firms, and Big 4 auditors support debt raising in both private and public firms. Consistent with private firms facing greater information asymmetry, Big 4 auditors are more important for debt raising in private firms than in public firms. The benefit of appointing Big 4 auditors for private firms' debt raising is greater in the opaque information environment of the global financial crisis. It is also greater when firms are smaller, younger, or have poorer financial reporting quality. We also find evidence consistent with Big 4 auditors mitigating agency conflicts and enhancing debt raising when ownership concentration is higher in private firms.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Corporate Finance and Governance · Credit Risk and Financial Regulations
参考文献 61
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 5
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条