Twin‐grasper assisted mucosal inverted closure achieves complete healing of large perforations after gastric endoscopic full‐thickness resection
Qinbo Cai, Huafeng Fu, Lele Zhang, Minxuan Shen, Shaoxiong Yi, Rongman Xie, Wentong Lan, Wenqing Dong 等 13 位
Sun Yat-sen University The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center Cell Technology (China)
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and safety of a novel twin-grasper assisted mucosal inverted closure (TAMIC) technique for large perforations after gastric endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) in a porcine model. METHODS: Iatrogenic large perforations of the stomach were created and closed by an experienced endoscopist using the TAMIC technique in 12 pigs. Repeat gastroscopy was performed in 4 weeks after surgery to examine the wound sites and then the animals were killed. The primary outcomes were the successful TAMIC closure rate and the complete healing rate. Secondary end points included procedure time of TAMIC, complete inverted healing rate, delayed bleeding rate, and postsurgery perforation. Histologies of the wounds were analyzed by hematoxylin-eosin, Masson trichrome, and immunohistochemistry staining. RESULTS: The median size of the defects was 3.5 (range 2.5-4.5) cm. TAMIC was successfully performed in all the 12 pigs. Complete healing was achieved in 11 pigs 4 weeks after operation as one pig died postsurgery due to severe pneumonia. The median procedure time for TAMIC was 39 (range 23-81) min. The complete inverted healing rate was 45.5% (5/11). No delayed bleeding or postsurgery perforation was observed. Histologic analyses showed that both the epithelium and muscularis mucosae layers were appropriately connected under inverted healing. CONCLUSIONS: Twin-grasper assisted mucosal inverted closure is feasible and safe for closure of large perforations after gastric EFTR and could be a propagable and promising technique for clinical practice.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Esophageal and GI Pathology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes · Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
参考文献 23
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 6
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条