Effect of Computer‐Aided Detection During Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rate in a Community Hospital Setting: Randomized Controlled Trial
Yohei Yabuuchi, Kazuya Hosotani, Yoshiki Morihisa, Yukie Fujio, Daisuke Oshikawa, Manami Oshita, Momoko Iketani, Kazuyuki Tsukamoto 等 21 位
Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital Kyoto University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
OBJECTIVES: Computer-aided detection (CADe) is promising for improving adenoma detection rates (ADRs) but mostly in academic centers. Therefore, we evaluated the effect of CADe on ADR and related outcomes in a Japanese community hospital setting. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized controlled trial conducted between September 2022 and August 2023, patients were eligible for inclusion if they were 40 years of age or older and had undergone colonoscopy for screening, post-polypectomy surveillance, a positive fecal immunochemical test, or symptoms. Patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to undergo colonoscopy with or without CADe. The primary outcome was ADR. Secondary outcomes included the number of adenomas per colonoscopy (APC) and the withdrawal time. RESULTS: A total of 1041 patients were recruited. After exclusion, 497 and 501 patients in the control and CADe groups, respectively, were included in the analysis. ADR was 54.5% in the control group and 50.7% in the CADe group, with no significant difference between the groups (adjusted risk ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.05). The mean number of APC was lower in the CADe group than in the control group (1.34 vs. 1.14) (adjusted rate ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77-0.96). The mean withdrawal time was longer in the CADe group than in the control group (691 vs. 751 s, p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: CADe did not significantly improve ADR in a Japanese community hospital setting, possibly due to the high baseline ADR in the control group. Further research is needed to understand in which settings CADe is useful. TRIAL REGISTRATION: University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000049054.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI in cancer detection · Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
参考文献 44
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 9
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条