The International Tree‐Ring Data Bank ( ITRDB ) revisited: Data availability and global ecological representativity
Shoudong Zhao, Neil Pederson, Loïc D’Orangeville, Janneke Hille Ris Lambers, Emery R. Boose, Caterina Penone, Bruce A. Bauer, Yuan Jiang 等 9 位
Beijing Normal University State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology Harvard University University of New Brunswick
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Aim The International Tree‐Ring Data Bank ( ITRDB ) is the most comprehensive database of tree growth. To evaluate its usefulness and improve its accessibility to the broad scientific community, we aimed to: (a) quantify its biases, (b) assess how well it represents global forests, (c) develop tools to identify priority areas to improve its representativity, and d) make available the corrected database. Location Worldwide. Time period Contributed datasets between 1974 and 2017. Major taxa studied Trees. Methods We identified and corrected formatting issues in all individual datasets of the ITRDB . We then calculated the representativity of the ITRDB with respect to species, spatial coverage, climatic regions, elevations, need for data update, climatic limitations on growth, vascular plant diversity, and associated animal diversity. We combined these metrics into a global Priority Sampling Index ( PSI ) to highlight ways to improve ITRDB representativity. Results Our refined dataset provides access to a network of >52 million growth data points worldwide. We found, however, that the database is dominated by trees from forests with low diversity, in semi‐arid climates, coniferous species, and in western North America. Conifers represented 81% of the ITRDB and even in well‐sampled areas, broadleaves were poorly represented. Our PSI stressed the need to increase the database diversity in terms of broadleaf species and identified poorly represented regions that require scientific attention. Great gains will be made by increasing research and data sharing in African, Asian, and South American forests. Main conclusions The extensive data and coverage of the ITRDB show great promise to address macroecological questions. To achieve this, however, we have to overcome the significant gaps in the representativity of the ITRDB . A strategic and organized group effort is required, and we hope the tools and data provided here can guide the efforts to improve this invaluable database.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Tree-ring climate responses
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics · Forest ecology and management
参考文献 62
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 197
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条