The Heuristics and Biases of Top Managers: Past, Present, and Future
Gerard P. Hodgkinson, Barbara Burkhard, Nicolai J. Foss, Dietmar Grichnik, Riikka M. Sarala, Yi Tang, Marc van Essen
University of Manchester Aalto University Copenhagen Business School University of St.Gallen
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Psychology‐grounded research on heuristics and biases in decision making has become increasingly influential in the field of management studies. However, although this line of inquiry is recognized as a valuable perspective for advancing understanding of decision processes in the upper echelons of firms, extant research remains unbalanced, the bulk of previous endeavours having been focused on managerial overconfidence, with insights from more recent dual‐process theory and ecological rationality conceptions of heuristics less explored. This introductory article to the special issue of the Journal of Management Studies , entitled ‘the heuristics and biases of top managers: Past, present, and future’, offers a reflective review of prior work addressing its focal theme and places the articles incorporated into the special issue within this broader context. In addition, it sets out a number of directions for future work, with a view to inspiring the continuing advancement of conceptual and empirical knowledge and management practice.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Innovation and Knowledge Management
Business Strategy and Innovation · Complex Systems and Decision Making
参考文献 185
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 63
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条