TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods
Professor Gary S. Collins, Karel G.M. Moons, Paula Dhiman, Richard D Riley, Andrew L. Beam, Ben Van Calster, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Xiaoxuan Liu 等 34 位
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre University of Oxford Utrecht University University Medical Center Utrecht
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis) statement was published in 2015 to provide the minimum reporting recommendations for studies developing or evaluating the performance of a prediction model. Methodological advances in the field of prediction have since included the widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI) powered by machine learning methods to develop prediction models. An update to the TRIPOD statement is thus needed. TRIPOD+AI provides harmonised guidance for reporting prediction model studies, irrespective of whether regression modelling or machine learning methods have been used. The new checklist supersedes the TRIPOD 2015 checklist, which should no longer be used. This article describes the development of TRIPOD+AI and presents the expanded 27 item checklist with more detailed explanation of each reporting recommendation, and the TRIPOD+AI for Abstracts checklist. TRIPOD+AI aims to promote the complete, accurate, and transparent reporting of studies that develop a prediction model or evaluate its performance. Complete reporting will facilitate study appraisal, model evaluation, and model implementation.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Healthcare cost, quality, practices
参考文献 99
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 2,746
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条