Active Human Agency in Artificial Intelligence Mediation
Rosanna Fanni, Valerie Eveline Steinkogler, Giulia Zampedri, Jos Pierson
IMEC
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Recently, scholars across disciplines raised questions and concerns about the notion of human intervention [1], control, and oversight over AI systems [2]. This observation becomes particularly important in the age of ubiquitous computing and the increasing adoption of AI in everyday technological infrastructure. This paper proposes a conceptual interpretation and future research agenda for the concept of human agency in times of ubiquitous AI. Building on Nicholas Garnham's theoretical framework in 2000 [3], this paper explains the concept of mediation through human agents, technological tools and systems of symbolic representation. As AI-enabled mediation becomes ever more prominent in different sectors, this paper reconsiders Garnham's mediation framework and the role of human agents in 2020, twenty years ahead. This paper proposes distinguishing between passive and active human agency and calls for theoretical and empirical research on individual AI redress. Ultimately, this paper argues to empower active human agency in times of ubiquitous AI
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems
参考文献 23
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 7
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条