What is Your Location Privacy Worth? Monetary Valuation of Different Location Types and Privacy Influencing Factors
Vera Schmitt, Zhenni Li, Maija Poikela, Robert P. Spang, Sebastian Möller
Technische Universität Berlin Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin German Research Centre for Artificial Intelligence
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Nowadays, many apps use location data to estimate the user's behavior for targeted advertising, predicting significant locations, personal preferences, state of health, and sports activities. Users of location-based services are often left with no other choice than to accept or reject location tracking when they want to use various applications. Especially, users with higher privacy concerns may reduce the frequency of location tracking by turning it off in the settings. However, most users are unaware that many applications installed on their phones are continuously tracking them. Therefore, this study attempts to answer how (obviously) being tracked over one-week influences a user's privacy concerns. The study was implemented using an iOS app, which participants could install on their smartphones. Moreover, over one week, the participants were requested to answer daily mini-questionnaires about how much they would be willing to pay for the protection of their location information on a monthly basis and how much money they were willing to accept in exchange for their location information. Hereby, the context was an important criterion to determine how the monetary values vary among different location types for, among others, home location, work location, and meeting family and friends. The participants (N=51) interacted with the app on a daily basis by filling out various daily mini-surveys based on their significant locations visited. The results show a significant difference between the monetary valuating of willingness to pay and to accept for all location types except work location and sharing scenarios contributing to further empirical evidence for the endowment effect. The obvious fact of continuously being tracked did not increase the privacy concern of participants.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Consumer Retail Behavior Studies · Sharing Economy and Platforms
参考文献 23
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 11
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条