The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking: Self-Reported Reductions in Cognitive Effort and Confidence Effects From a Survey of Knowledge Workers
Hao-Ping Lee, Advait Sarkar, Lev Tankelevitch, Ian Drosos, Sean Rintel, Richard Banks, Nicholas Wilson
Carnegie Mellon University Microsoft Research (United Kingdom)
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The rise of Generative AI (GenAI) in knowledge workflows raises questions about its impact on critical thinking skills and practices.We survey 319 knowledge workers to investigate 1) when and how they perceive the enaction of critical thinking when using GenAI, and 2) when and why GenAI affects their effort to do so.Participants shared 936 first-hand examples of using GenAI in work tasks.Quantitatively, when considering both task-and user-specific factors, a user's task-specific self-confidence and confidence in GenAI are predictive of whether critical thinking is enacted and the effort of doing so in GenAI-assisted tasks.Specifically, higher confidence in GenAI is associated with less critical thinking, while higher self-confidence is associated with more critical thinking.Qualitatively, GenAI shifts the nature of critical thinking toward information verification, response integration, and task stewardship.Our insights reveal new design challenges and opportunities for developing GenAI tools for knowledge work.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
Education and Critical Thinking Development · AI in Service Interactions
参考文献 115
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 415
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条