Model Diagnostics and Forecast Evaluation for Quantiles
Tilmann Gneiting, Daniel Wolffram, Johannes Resin, Kristof Kraus, Johannes Bracher, Timo Dimitriadis, Veit Hagenmeyer, Alexander I. Jordan 等 11 位
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies Heidelberg University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Model diagnostics and forecast evaluation are closely related tasks, with the former concerning in-sample goodness (or lack) of fit and the latter addressing predictive performance out-of-sample. We review the ubiquitous setting in which forecasts are cast in the form of quantiles or quantile-bounded prediction intervals. We distinguish unconditional calibration, which corresponds to classical coverage criteria, from the stronger notion of conditional calibration, as can be visualized in quantile reliability diagrams. Consistent scoring functions—including, but not limited to, the widely used asymmetricpiecewise linear score or pinball loss—provide for comparative assessment and ranking, and link to the coefficient of determination and skill scores. We illustrate the use of these tools on Engel's food expenditure data, the Global Energy Forecasting Competition 2014, and the US COVID-19 Forecast Hub.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
经济 / 管理Market Dynamics and Volatility
Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
参考文献 76
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 34
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条