Aging in Place: Evolution of a Research Topic Whose Time Has Come
Sarinnapha M. Vasunilashorn, Bernard A. Steinman, Phoebe S. Liebig, Jon Pynoos
Princeton University Brown University University of Southern California
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Over the past 30 years, policy makers and professionals who provide services to older adults with chronic conditions and impairments have placed greater emphasis on conceptualizing aging in place as an attainable and worthwhile goal. Little is known, however, of the changes in how this concept has evolved in aging research. To track trends in aging in place, we examined scholarly articles published from 1980 to 2010 that included the concept in eleven academic gerontology journals. We report an increase in the absolute number and proportion of aging-in-place manuscripts published during this period, with marked growth in the 2000s. Topics related to the environment and services were the most commonly examined during 2000-2010 (35% and 31%, resp.), with a substantial increase in manuscripts pertaining to technology and health/functioning. This underscores the increase in diversity of topics that surround the concept of aging-in-place literature in gerontological research.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Aging, Health, and Disability · Technology Use by Older Adults
参考文献 40
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 227
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条