Parenthesis: Syntactic Integration or Orphanage? A Rejoinder to
James E. Griffiths, Mark de Vries
University of Konstanz University of Groningen
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
In Griffiths and De Vries 2013 (G&dV), we offer an argument in favor of treating appositive relative clauses (ARCs) as syntactically integrated into their hosts, an argument that revolves around the distribution of ARCs in clausal ellipsis environments. In a reply, Ott (2016) counters this specific argument, rejects the more general integration analysis adopted in G&dV on conceptual grounds, and contends that an orphanage analysis of ARCs provides a more parsimonious explanation for the data introduced there. In this rejoinder, we demonstrate that, while Ott presents some relevant data and provides welcome discussion, his specific counterargument does not withstand scrutiny. We also defend the integration approach to ARCs on conceptual and empirical grounds and examine the orphanage analysis of ARCs, arguing that such an approach has conceptual and empirical inadequacies that no integration approach exhibits.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Natural Language Processing Techniques
参考文献 66
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 20
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条