The Weekend Effect in Online Reviews
Andreas Bayerl, Verena Schoenmueller, Jacob Goldenberg, Florian Stahl
Erasmus University Rotterdam American Marketing Association University of Mannheim
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
This article finds that online reviews submitted during the weekend tend to have lower rating scores than reviews submitted during the week. Analyzing 400 million reviews across 33 e-commerce, hospitality, entertainment, and employer platforms, the authors find that weekend reviews have a 3% lower relative share of 5-star ratings and a 6% higher relative share of 1-, 2-, or 3-star ratings compared with weekday reviews. The pattern emerges even when controlling for quality of reviewed items. This weekend effect is surprising given that studies usually report higher happiness levels and a better mood on weekends. The authors discuss several explanations related to where the review is submitted (platform characteristics), what the review is about (listing characteristics), and who submits the review (reviewer characteristics). They present evidence that temporal self-selection of reviewers is a dominant driver of the weekend effect. During the weekend, a different set of users—those more prone to write negative reviews—is more likely to leave a review. These findings complement extant research on review self-selection by adding a temporal layer to the self-selection processes inherent in online reviews. This article also highlights managerial implications by demonstrating that solicitations sent during the weekend (vs. weekday solicitation) lead to collecting more negative reviews.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Media Studies and Communication
Media, Gender, and Advertising
参考文献 0
引用本文 4
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条