Factors influencing artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in the age of generative AI chatbots for health information seeking
Yang Liu, Ying-Yueh Su, Anas Alhur, Salman Bin Naeem
South China Agricultural University City University of Macau Fu Jen Catholic University University of Ha'il
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy plays a significant role in effectively communicating with AI generative chatbots for seeking health information or advice, as well as communicating with healthcare professionals and public health officials. The study aims to identify the factors influencing AI literacy and its subsequent influence on consumers’ behavioral intentions toward seeking health information using generative AI chatbots. A nine-factor measurement model (INS, ISE, IFO, AIH, ANX, AVD, AIL, BI, AIC) was developed with the help of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and tested using structural equation modeling. The results of SEM analysis demonstrate that IFO (β = 0.138, CR = 2.731, p < .05), ANX (β = 0.175, CR = 3.103, p < .05), and AVD (β = 0.158, CR = 3.855, p < .05) had a statistically positive significant influence on AI literacy. Similarly, BI (β = 0.128, CR = 2.423, p < .05) had a statistically positive significant influence on AIC. A positive but non-significant effect of INS on AIL was also observed (β=0.058, CR = 1.006, p > .05). AIL also had a positive but non-significant effect on BI (β=0.050, CR = 1.598, p > .05). Additionally, the results of model fit indices show adequate model fit values: χ2 = 1.679 DF = 1867; p = .000; IFI = 0.954; TLI = 0.951; CFI = 0.953; RMSEA = 0.031. The findings conclude that information overload, anxiety, and avoidance significantly influence AI literacy. On the other hand, information source exposure, AI hallucination, and information seeking do not significantly influence consumers’ AI literacy level. The study suggests that health professionals and staff could be equipped with better knowledge and skills related to AI applications in healthcare settings.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · AI in Service Interactions
参考文献 85
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 11
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条