Shared Autonomous Vehicle Scheduling with Heterogeneous Ride-Sharing Preferences and Mixed-Capacity Fleet Sizing
Hongjun Cui, Jinping Xie, Minqing Zhu, Wanru Sun, Yizhe Yang
Hebei University of Technology
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
With the rapid advancement of shared autonomous vehicle (SAV) technology and its great potential in optimizing urban transportation, scheduling models that rely solely on single-capacity vehicles struggle to effectively accommodate passengers’ heterogeneous ride-sharing preferences. This paper proposes a mixed-capacity SAV scheduling strategy that accounts for heterogeneous ride-sharing preferences, aimed at balancing diverse passengers’ ride-sharing willingness and maximizing the transportation benefits of shared mobility. By introducing the concept of “weighted edge contraction,” the weighted graph structure for solving the ride-sharing matching problem is simplified. First, by considering passengers’ heterogeneous ride-sharing preferences that encompass no ride-sharing, 2-passenger ride-sharing, 4-passenger ride-sharing scenarios, we analyzed system performance across different fleet configurations. The results demonstrated that deploying a mixed fleet with capacities of two and four passengers led to better performance across both system efficiency and service quality metrics. This strategy not only reduced the total number of vehicles in the network, decreased overall travel distance, and lowered fuel consumption, it also lowered passenger travel fares without compromising average waiting times. Next, by considering differences in passengers’ willingness to ride-share, we analyzed how system performance changed with different ride-sharing request ratios. The results revealed that higher ride-sharing acceptance rates facilitated travel request consolidation, leading to fewer deployed vehicles, shorter travel times and distances, and reduced energy consumption. Therefore, our proposed mixed-capacity vehicle scheduling strategy offers theoretical insights for optimizing SAV operations across diverse request scenarios.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods · Transportation Planning and Optimization
参考文献 30
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 1
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条