An Updated Guideline for Assessing Discriminant Validity
Mikko Rönkkö, Eunseong Cho
University of Jyväskylä Kwangwoon University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Discriminant validity was originally presented as a set of empirical criteria that can be assessed from multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) matrices. Because datasets used by applied researchers rarely lend themselves to MTMM analysis, the need to assess discriminant validity in empirical research has led to the introduction of numerous techniques, some of which have been introduced in an ad hoc manner and without rigorous methodological support. We review various definitions of and techniques for assessing discriminant validity and provide a generalized definition of discriminant validity based on the correlation between two measures after measurement error has been considered. We then review techniques that have been proposed for discriminant validity assessment, demonstrating some problems and equivalencies of these techniques that have gone unnoticed by prior research. After conducting Monte Carlo simulations that compare the techniques, we present techniques called CI CFA (sys) and [Formula: see text](sys) that applied researchers can use to assess discriminant validity.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIAdvanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Multi-Criteria Decision Making
参考文献 95
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 1,277
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条