Universal design for learning in physical education: Overview and critical reflection
Justin Anthony Haegele, Steven K. Holland, Wesley J. Wilson, Anthony John Maher, T. N. Kirk, Aaron Mason
Old Dominion University Norwegian University of Science and Technology University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Leeds Beckett University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Universal design for learning (UDL) has been advocated for by adapted physical education scholars as a panacea to the challenges associated with teaching disabled and nondisabled students together in physical education. So much so that UDL currently occupies a privileged and largely unquestioned position in adapted physical education scholarship and practice, until now. To move scholarship forward, this article draws on published theoretical and empirical work relating to UDL generally and in physical education in particular to critically discuss the scientific research supporting, or not, the use of UDL as a so-called inclusive approach. We end this article with a call to action for scholars in this field, ourselves included, to conduct theoretically guided and empirically informed research relating to UDL in physical education, which adheres to established hallmarks of research quality that are tied to the ontological and epistemological assumptions of researchers because, at present, it is conspicuous by its absence.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Physical Education and Pedagogy · Disability Education and Employment