Social media algorithmic versus professional journalists’ news selection: Effects of gate keeping on traditional and social media news trust
Rebecca Scheffauer, Manuel Goyanes, Homero Gil de Zúñiga
Universidad de Salamanca Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Pennsylvania State University Universidad Diego Portales
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Research has shown positive attitudes toward journalists and their roles foster pro-democratic outcomes. With the rise of social media as news sources, algorithms operate as gatekeepers, which may alter linkages between public opinion, journalists, and media trust. However, results from a panel-survey conducted in the U.S. underline citizens’ preference for journalist gatekeeping in fueling trust in traditional and social media news. Conversely, preference for algorithmic news selection does not affect people’s levels of trust. Furthermore, traditional news use moderates this relationship as those who report higher traditional news use and a preference for professional news gatekeeping trust traditional news the most. This study contributes to current discussions on the effects of preference for journalists’ or algorithmic news selection, arguing that evaluations of journalists’ editorial work remain critical to explain media trust.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学Social Media and Politics
Misinformation and Its Impacts · Media Studies and Communication
参考文献 61
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 25
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条