Damage detection with ultrasonic guided waves using machine learning and aggregated baselines
Vivek Nerlikar, Olivier Mesnil, Roberto Miorelli, Oscar D’Almeida
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives Université Paris-Saclay Laboratoire d'Intégration des Systèmes et des Technologies Safran (France)
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
In guided wave (GW)-based structural health monitoring (SHM), ultrasonic elastic waves are used to detect damages in structures by comparing the acquired signals with those acquired before defect formation. Making the SHM system automatic, especially for similar structures, such as turbine blades, is rather challenging. The high sensitivity of GWs to environmental and operational conditions, the variabilities due to sensor positioning, sensor coupling, and material variability in composites limit the baseline application. This work presents a machine learning (ML)-based damage detection method using aggregated baselines independent of their damaged states to enhance the generalization capability of ML algorithms by considering similar structures’ variabilities. The methodology relies on feature extraction from raw GW signals and training classification algorithms (e.g., kernel machines, ensemble methods, and neural networks). Two experimental data sets on composite panels are used. The first experimental data set of 45 composite panels is used to validate the approach by considering the aforementioned inter-specimen variabilities. Half of the 45 panels provide pristine data, and the rest provide damaged data so that the same sample is present in the training or test set but never in both. High classification performance is obtained, demonstrating that the classifier has successfully learned to recognize defect signatures despite the influence of the variabilities linked to the multiple instrumented specimens. The second experimental data set of 1 composite panel with temperature variation is used. Good classification performance is obtained without using baseline correction methods.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
工程Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
参考文献 41
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 56
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条