Agile, Traditional, and Hybrid Approaches to Project Success: Is Hybrid a Poor Second Choice?
Andrew Gemino, Blaize Horner Reich, Pedro Serrador
Simon Fraser University University of Toronto
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Three project management approaches—traditional, agile, and hybrid—were considered in this study. Results from an international study, including 477 cross-industry projects, indicated that 52% of projects could be categorized as hybrid approaches. A regression analysis using multiple outcome measures indicated substantial explanatory power (0.21 < R 2 <0.41). Analysis suggested that hybrid and agile approaches significantly increase stakeholder success over traditional approaches while achieving the same budget, time, scope, and quality outcomes. Hybrid approaches were found to be similar in effectiveness to fully agile approaches. Results validate decisions by practitioners to combine agile and traditional practices and suggest that hybrid is a leading project management approach.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AISoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices
Construction Project Management and Performance · Technology Assessment and Management
参考文献 73
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 227
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条