Hybrid natural language processing tool for semantic annotation of medical texts in Spanish
Leonardo Campillos Llanos, Ana Valverde-Mateos, Adrián Capllonch-Carrión
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Instituto de Lengua Literatura y Antropología Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
BACKGROUND: Natural language processing (NLP) enables the extraction of information embedded within unstructured texts, such as clinical case reports and trial eligibility criteria. By identifying relevant medical concepts, NLP facilitates the generation of structured and actionable data, supporting complex tasks like cohort identification and the analysis of clinical records. To accomplish those tasks, we introduce a deep learning-based and lexicon-based named entity recognition (NER) tool for texts in Spanish. It performs medical NER and normalization, medication information extraction and detection of temporal entities, negation and speculation, and temporality or experiencer attributes (Age, Contraindicated, Negated, Speculated, Hypothetical, Future, Family_member, Patient and Other). We built the tool with a dedicated lexicon and rules adapted from NegEx and HeidelTime. Using these resources, we annotated a corpus of 1200 texts, with high inter-annotator agreement (average F1 = 0.841% ± 0.045 for entities, and average F1 = 0.881% ± 0.032 for attributes). We used this corpus to train Transformer-based models (RoBERTa-based models, mBERT and mDeBERTa). We integrated them with the dictionary-based system in a hybrid tool, and distribute the models via the Hugging Face hub. For an internal validation, we used a held-out test set and conducted an error analysis. For an external validation, eight medical professionals evaluated the system by revising the annotation of 200 new texts not used in development. RESULTS: In the internal validation, the models yielded F1 values up to 0.915. In the external validation with 100 clinical trials, the tool achieved an average F1 score of 0.858 (± 0.032); and in 100 anonymized clinical cases, it achieved an average F1 score of 0.910 (± 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: The tool is available at https://claramed.csic.es/medspaner . We also release the code ( https://github.com/lcampillos/medspaner ) and the annotated corpus to train the models.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
Topic Modeling · Machine Learning in Healthcare
参考文献 106
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 8
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条