Conservative allocation strategy of nitrogen and phosphorus among leaves, stems and roots of Artemisia species
Haiyang Gong, Dongdong Duan, Youcun Suo, Nan Jia, Kun Hu, Jiahui Chen, Nan Hu, Zhao Guofu 等 9 位
Southwest Minzu University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
BACKGROUND: Understanding the allocation of nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) among various plant organs is crucial for gaining insights into plant nutrient uptake, utilization strategies, and overall growth and life history strategies. However, little is known about the nitrogen and phosphorus allocation strategies among the three major plant organs (e.g., leaves, stems, and roots), particularly in phylogenetically closely related species. To investigate N and P allocation strategies among different plant organs, we collected 912 individuals of 62 Artemisia species, encompassing three subgenera, from 81 sites across a broad environmental expanse in China. RESULTS: ) between leaves and stems, and leaves and root were consistently more than 1, while the corresponding scaling exponents for stems versus roots were either close to or less than 1; however, the numerical values of the scaling exponents among the three plant organs differed at subgenera levels but were relatively consistent across different ecosystems. Climate and soil had little effect on the numerical values of the scaling exponents among plant organs of Artemisia species at different local sites. CONCLUSION: Our results found that the allocation of N and P among plant organs in Artemisia species differs at the subgenera level, suggesting that it is necessary to consider different subgenus levels when exploring plant nutrient concentration and allocation. Conversely, a conservative nutrient allocation strategy prevails at the ecosystem level. Thus, a key insight from these results is that nutrient allocation strategies of closely related species are phylogenetically conserved and are comparatively insensitive to local environmental conditions.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics · Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
参考文献 53
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 6
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条