Seismic responses in two kinds of reservoirs: Condensate gas and light oil
Yuehua Ma, Bai Yuhua, Wu Shuyan, Ren Jingxiong, Yang Shichao, Shuo Wang, Zhu Jingjing
China National Petroleum Corporation (China)
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Oilfield X is lithologic reservoir composed of sandstones and mudstones. Due to the complicated seismic response mechanism, it is difficult to predict reservoir from seismic data in case of the following two types of reservoirs: condensate gas and light oil. From the new drilling well bs37, the two reservoirs are 80 meters apart vertically. They are both normal cycle and tested with oil and gas. However, there is a great difference between the seismic responses of the two sets: horizon ① is of strong reflection for most parts, but blank reflection for the reservoir; horizon ② is of strong reflection, and stronger reflection in the reservoir part. Why does a great difference exist between seismic responses of the two reservoirs under the same geological condition? In this study, petrophysical analysis, forward modeling, the effective reservoir thickness, P.V.T. (pressure/volume/temperature) test data results, gas-oil ratio and acoustic impedance intersections, and so on, are integrated to clarify the forming mechanism of the seismic response for the two sets of reservoirs. The combination of dynamic and static methods, for example the P.V.T. test results, the effective thickness and gas-oil ratio, are very key. Conclusion is that reservoir ① belongs to the normal cycle - weak reflection condensate gas reservoir and reservoir ② belongs to the normal cycle-strong reflection light oil reservoir. Presentation Date: Thursday, October 20, 2016 Start Time: 11:00:00 AM Location: 156 Presentation Type: ORAL
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis · Geological Studies and Exploration