Estimation of Causal Effects with Multiple Treatments: A Review and New Ideas
Michael J. Lopez, Roee Gutman
Skidmore College Department of Physics, Mathematics and Informatics Brown University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
The propensity score is a common tool for estimating the causal effect of a binary treatment in observational data. In this setting, matching, subclassification, imputation or inverse probability weighting on the propensity score can reduce the initial covariate bias between the treatment and control groups. With more than two treatment options, however, estimation of causal effects requires additional assumptions and techniques, the implementations of which have varied across disciplines. This paper reviews current methods, and it identifies and contrasts the treatment effects that each one estimates. Additionally, we propose possible matching techniques for use with multiple, nominal categorical treatments, and use simulations to show how such algorithms can yield improved covariate similarity between those in the matched sets, relative the pre-matched cohort. To sum, this manuscript provides a synopsis of how to notate and use causal methods for categorical treatments.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
计算机 / AIAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Methods and Inference
参考文献 107
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 153
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条