115 Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Matched Study Investigating Patient-Reported and Surgical Outcomes
James Henry Mooney, Giorgos D. Michalopoulos, Mohammed Ali Alvi, David Zeitouni, Andrew Kai-Hong Chan, Praveen V. Mummaneni, Erica Fay Bisson, Regis William Haid 等 13 位
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
INTRODUCTION: With the expanding indications for and increasing popularity of minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) for lumbar spinal fusion, large-scale analysis of patient outcomes after MIS approaches compared to traditional open procedures is warranted. METHODS: Patients undergoing MIS and open lumbar fusion were matched at a 1:2 ratio on 33 baseline variables to create two highly homogeneous groups. Primary endpoints of interest were overall satisfaction and a decrease in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 3 months postoperatively. Satisfaction was defined as score 1-2 in the North American Spine Association index; minimal clinically important disease (MCID) for ODI was defined as = 30% decrease from baseline. Secondary endpoints were satisfaction and decrease in ODI at 12 months, length of stay (LOS), operative time, and incidental durotomy rate. RESULTS: The MIS and open groups consisted of 1,483 and 2,966 patients, respectively. MIS fusion patients had a higher odds of satisfaction compared to open surgery at 3 months (OR = 1.4, p = 0.004), while maintaining non-inferior odds of satisfaction at 12 months (OR = 1.04, p = 0.67). Lumbar stenosis, single-level fusion, predominant back pain, higher ASA grade, and absence of spondylolisthesis were associated with higher odds of satisfaction with MIS compared to open surgery. Patients in the MIS group had slightly lower ODI scores at 3 months (mean difference=1.61, p = 0.006; MCID OR = 1.14, p = 0.0495), and 12 months (mean difference=2.35, p < 0.001; MCID OR = 1.29, p < 0.001). The groups did not differ in terms of operative time and incidental durotomy rate; however, LOS was shorter for the MIS group. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that MIS fusion is associated with higher odds of satisfaction and, possibly, a greater decrease in ODI than open fusion at 3 months postoperatively while maintaining a greater ODI improvement and performing non-inferiorly to open in regards to satisfaction at 12 months.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy · Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques