Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Michael E. Porter, Claas van der Linde
Harvard University University of St.Gallen University of Applied Sciences St. Gallen
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Accepting a fixed trade-off between environmental regulation and competitiveness unnecessarily raises costs and slows down environmental progress. Studies finding high environmental compliance costs have traditionally focused on static cost impacts, ignoring any offsetting productivity benefits from innovation. They typically overestimated compliance costs, neglected innovation offsets, and disregarded the affected industry's initial competitiveness. Rather than simply adding to cost, properly crafted environmental standards can trigger innovation offsets, allowing companies to improve their resource productivity. Shifting the debate from pollution control to pollution prevention was a step forward. It is now necessary to make the next step and focus on resource productivity.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
Climate Change Policy and Economics · Environmental Impact and Sustainability
参考文献 21
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 12,987
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条