Analysis of Research Trends on Parental Bowing Behavior Based on CiteSpace at Home and Abroad

目的：探究全球数字化背景下父母低头行为的跨文化研究格局，揭示其知识生产特征、主题演化路径及学科交叉趋势，为构建数字时代的家庭互动理论提供循证依据。方法：采用双数据库对比分析法，系统检索CNKI与WoS核心合集2019年1月1日至2025年5月10日相关文献，运用CiteSpace 6.2.R4进行：1) 时序分布图谱解析学科发展态势；2) 共现网络识别核心学术共同体；3) 关键词聚类与突现检测挖掘知识演进规律；4) 时区视图可视化研究范式转型。结果：纳入249篇文献(CNKI = 139, WoS = 110)显示：① 发文量呈非对称增长(中文年均增长率达31.4%，英文仅9.2%)；② 中文领域形成核心作者群(合作网络密度D = 0.018)，而国际研究呈现去中心化特征(D = 0.007)；③ 机构合作网络呈现“国内区域集聚–国际分散孤立”的二元结构；④ 高频关键词显示跨文化共识(“亲子关系”“心理健康”共现强度均 > 0.45)，但聚类维度差异显著(中文14类vs.英文6类)；⑤ 突现检测揭示研究焦点转向干预机制(“认知重评”Burst = 5.83，2021~2023)。结论：父母低头行为研究呈现三阶段理论进阶：1) 现象学描述(依恋理论解释)；2) 系统机制解析(家庭系统论框架下的中介/调节效应)；3) 跨学科干预探索(发展心理学 × 传播学交叉应用)。未来研究应着重：① 构建“数字媒介使用–代际沟通质量–儿童发展结果”的动态模型；② 开发基于虚拟现实的行为矫正方案；③ 设计家庭数字素养提升的阶梯式干预路径，通过“技术戒断–情感重建–能力培养”三级策略，重塑数字时代的亲子共生关系。Objective To explore the cross-cultural research pattern of parental bowing behavior under the global digital background, reveal its knowledge production characteristics, thematic evolution path, and interdisciplinary trends, and provide evidence-based basis for constructing a family interaction theory in the digital age. Method: The dual database comparative analysis method was used to systematically search for relevant literature in the CNKI and WoS core collections from January 1, 2019 to May 10, 2025. CiteSpace 6.2.R4 was used to: 1) analyze the development trend of disciplines through time-series distribution maps; 2) Co-occurrence network recognition core academic community; 3) Keyword clustering and emergence detection to explore the evolution of knowledge; 4) The paradigm shift in visualizing time zone views. The inclusion of 249 articles (CNKI = 139, WoS = 110) showed that: ① the number of publications increased asymmetrically (with an average annual growth rate of 31.4% in Chinese and only 9.2% in English); ② The Chinese field has formed a core group of authors (collaborative network density D = 0.018), while international research exhibits decentralized characteristics (D = 0.007); ③ The institutional cooperation network presents a binary structure of “domestic regional agglomeration—international dispersion and isolation”; ④ High frequency keywords display cross-cultural consensus (co-occurrence intensity of “parent-child relationship” and “mental health” are both greater than 0.45), but there are significant differences in clustering dimensions (14 categories in Chinese vs. 6 categories in English); ⑤ Emergent detection reveals a shift in research focus towards intervention mechanisms (“cognitive reappraisal” Burst = 5.83, 2021~2023). Conclusion: The study of parental bowing behavior presents a three-stage theoretical advancement: 1) phenomenological description (explained by attachment theory); 2) System mechanism analysis (mediating/moderating effects under the framework of family system theory); 3) Interdisciplinary intervention exploration (cross application of developmental psychology and communication studies). Future research should focus on: ① constructing a dynamic model of “digital media use intergenerational communication quality child development outcomes”; ② Develop behavior correction solutions based on virtual reality; ③ Design a stepped intervention path for improving family digital literacy, reshaping the parent-child symbiotic relationship in the digital age through a three-level strategy of “technology withdrawal emotional reconstruction ability cultivation”.