Fusion of airborne multimodal point clouds for vegetation parameter correction extraction in burned areas
Rong He, Zhen Dai, Guanghui Zhu, Weisen Bai
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Most experimental studies use unimodal data for processing, the RGB image point cloud cannot separate the shrub and tree layers according to the visible vegetation index, and the airborne laser point cloud is difficult to distinguish between the ground and grass ranges, to address the above problems, a multi-band information image fusing the LiDAR point cloud and the RGB image point cloud is constructed. In this study, data collected from UAV platforms, including RGB image point clouds and laser point clouds, were used to construct a fine canopy height model (using laser point cloud data) and high-definition digital orthophotos (using image point cloud data), and the orthophotos were fused with a canopy height model (CHM) by selecting the Difference Enhancement Vegetation Index (DEVI) and Normalised Green-Blue Discrepancy Index (NGBDI) after comparing the accuracy of different indices. Morphological reconstruction of CHM + DEVI/NGBDI fusion image, remove unreasonable values; construct training samples, using classification regression tree algorithm, segmentation of the range of the burned areas and adaptive extraction of vegetation as trees, shrubs and grasslands, tree areas as foreground markers using the local maximum algorithm to detect the tree apexes, the non-tree areas are assigned to be the background markers, and the Watershed Transform is performed to obtain the segmentation contour; the original laser point cloud is divided into chunks according to the segmented single-tree contour, and the highest point is traversed to search for the highest point, and corrected for the height of the single-tree elevations one by one. Accuracy analysis of the vegetation information extracted by the method with the measured data showed that the improved method increased the overall recall rate by 4.1%, the overall precision rate by 3.7%, the overall accuracy F1 score by 3.9%, and the tree height accuracy by 8.8%, 1.4%, 1.7%, 6.4%, 1.8%, and 0.3%, respectively, in the six sampling plots. The effectiveness of the improved method is verified, while the higher the degree of vegetation mixing in the region the better the extraction effect of the improved algorithm.
逐年被引趋势
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
物理Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
参考文献 40
此处列出前 3 条
引用本文 3
按被引量排序,此处列出前 3 条