Rethinking Public Sector Accountability in Digital Transformation: A Critical Integrative Review
Indra Wijaya, Suprapto Suprapto, Basri Rakhman, Dedy Herianto, Sintia Yulianti, Dody Agriyanto, Akmal Akmal, Kasman Kasman 等 15 位
Politeknik Sandi Karsa Institut Teknologi dan Bisnis Nobel Indonesia Universitas Pancasakti Makassar Muhammadiyah University of Makassar
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Digital transformation is reshaping public sector accountability by expanding the availability, visibility, and circulation of governmental data while reconfiguring relationships among public institutions, citizens, private actors, and digital technologies.This article presents a critical integrative review of literature on digital transformation and public sector accountability. It synthesizes foundational accountability scholarship, prior structured reviews, and recent studies published mainly between 2021 and 2025 to examine how digitalization affects accountability mechanisms in public administration. The review identifies six major themes: transparency and open data, citizen participation and social media, performance measurement and analytics, digital financial management and auditing, AI and algorithmic accountability, and social equity in digital governance. The synthesis shows that digital tools such as open data platforms, social media, performance dashboards, integrated financial systems, artificial intelligence, and big data analytics can enhance transparency, citizen engagement, performance monitoring, and financial oversight. However, these technologies also generate significant accountability challenges, including information overload, uneven digital capacity, fragmented responsibility in multi-actor ecosystems, algorithmic opacity, data interpretation risks, surveillance concerns, and exclusion arising from digital divides. The article argues that digital accountability is not merely a technical outcome of adopting new tools, but a socio-technical process shaped by institutional design, human capacity, ethical safeguards, data practices, and inclusive governance. It contributes by developing an integrative lens organized around accountability actors, forums, mechanisms, and risks. The review proposes a future research agenda focused on dialogic and horizontal accountability, AI and data intermediary governance, inclusive digital participation, accountability for unintended consequences, and frameworks that align digital innovation with democratic values, public trust, equity, and public value.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
社会科学E-Government and Public Services
Public Policy and Administration Research · Smart Cities and Technologies