Construction and validation of the AI Ethics Scale in language research
Bora DEMİR, Selami Aydın
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Istanbul Medeniyet University
阅读操作
确认中在文库中上传 PDF 后可生成中文音频讲解。
摘要与影响
Despite the growing relevance of artificial intelligence (AI) in language research, there is a lack of validated instruments to assess researchers’ ethical awareness regarding its use. Given the increasing integration of AI into technology-enhanced language teaching, assessment and learning environments, there is also a need to develop scales to provide a foundation for strengthening ethical AI practices across language research contexts. This study aimed to develop and validate the AI Ethical Awareness and Responsibility Scale (AI-EARS) to measure ethical awareness and responsibility in AI use among language researchers. The scale development process followed established validation standards and involved exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. After item reduction, a two-factor structure was identified in the exploratory analysis, while a confirmatory factor analysis supported a refined one-factor, five-item model with strong model fit and excellent internal consistency. This final structure emerged because several items demonstrated weak loadings, high residual correlations or conceptual overlap during confirmatory analysis, which indicated that they did not sufficiently contribute to the latent construct. Evidence for concurrent validity and test-retest reliability further supported the psychometric robustness of the scale. Implications for practice or policy: Language researchers should adopt the AI-EARS to self-assess and enhance their ethical awareness when integrating AI tools into their studies. Academic institutions could incorporate the AI-EARS into research ethics training programmes to promote responsible AI use among scholars. Research policymakers may use the AI-EARS as a benchmark to develop guidelines addressing ethical AI practices in language research. AI-EARS serves institutions as a diagnostic tool, enabling targeted training to ensure ethical and transparent AI integration in language research.
逐年被引趋势
暂无年度引用数据
关键指标
同类平均 = 1
同领域 · 同年份 · 同类型
Google Scholar 与 OpenAlex 的被引统计范围不同,数值存在差异属正常。
AI 辅助阅读
依据:摘要
可就本文提问;依据不足时会说明。
学术脉络
学科主题
生物医学Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)